Category Archives: Webdesign

Greenpeace International migrates to Planet Three

Planet 3

Planet III — launched May 2010

It sounds like Sci Fi. But it’s the latest incarnation of the “Greenpeace Planet” website and Content Management System, which we launched today. It involved more than a year of effort, lots of sweat and blood and not a few tears,  by a great many people led by Andrew Davies.   The  system selection process alone evaluated 42 long-list and 12 short-list candidate systems with a global User Reference Group, that amazingly came to a unanimous decision about the technology.  The new site has been designed from the bottom up to integrate social networking and draw big focus on our online campaign efforts.  It’s also, thanks to the Design Eye of Elaine Hill, a drop-dead gorgeous piece of eye candy.

It moves us ever closer to a dream that a bunch of Webbies had back at the turn of the century (ayep, that long ago) when, over beers, we considered what it would be like if instead of having dozens of different Greenpeace national websites and designs and systems around the world, we could work together to come up with a single common but flexible design, run by a common content management system that would allow us to share content and assets around the world, clone stories within language groups, and aggregate the global people power of our online actions across the globe.

At the time we had those discussion, our Greenpeace International page was composed by hand,  and its big cutting

Greenpeace website 2002

edge feature was a background image that changed randomly when you hit the home page.  Sometimes you’d get moss, sometimes beach, sometimes tree.  It was way cool in its day, in the same way the HTML command was cool in its day.

Most of the content we were posting then was press releases, slapped into HTML and FTPed over to our web server, which was in the attic of our office, by a two-man web team, Martin Baker and Gillo Cutupri. Martin did the words. Gillo did the pictures. By 2002  we had a sign-up form, where you could add your email to a mailing list, which we’d set up at the encouragement of Kevin Jardine, who prophesied that email lists were going to be important, and one of the website’s main purposes should be to get people networking with us through email so we could involve them in “online campaigns.”  This was crazy talk.

April 2003

We launched a site in 1999 that was built on Zope.  It’s big design feature was a spinning globe, and it had menus with “rounded corners.” These were achieved with tiny rounded corner gif images carefully placed with a relatively new technology called CSS.   But it also boasted an online forum, which would grow into a community of activists that did some amazing, pioneering online campaign work over the years.  One of the veterans of that community, Lisa Vickers,  found her way from forum member to volunteer to a Greenpeace ship and works today at the Greenpeace International headquarters as a digital campaigner.  I knew her for years only as “Lizardfish” from the forum.

Planet 1, our first real global content management system, was built in OpenACSand ran on the most robust technology of its day: an AOL server. Yes, AOL, as in America OnLine, the first Server Farmers.  We needed to build our own content management system because none existed in those days that would work in every character set, every language, every layout we needed to serve an organisation that had offices in Russia, Japan, Thailand, Israel and the Arabic world and was moving into China.  Bruno Mattarollo, an Argentine techie and activist, came on board as technical lead.  At some point we realised we needed project manager, and recruited Danielle Hickey, who had run Greenpeace Australia’s web presence, to leave Sydney and join the mad crew in Amsterdam. (She would eventually head back to Sydney with Bruno in tow. I tried to get them to name their first child Planet One. Fortunately, they resisted).   The build of Planet One was insane.  I remember pizza-fuelled nights in the office that lasted until most of the bars in Amsterdam were closed (and bars in Amsterdam stay open verrrrrry late) and a small army of webbies and volunteers helping move thousands of pages that had been hand built into a database. We celebrated the launch with super soaker squirt guns in pedal boats on the Amsterdam canals.

Planet One served us until 2005, when it was time to move to a new system, developed by Lars Pind and

Planet II: April 2005 — May 2010

project managed by Stephen Donnelly over the course of two years. It marked a new era as we moved steadily from a handful of pioneering offices to bring 22 or our national websites on board, saving millions of eurodollars by not pursuing multiple national design and backend tracks.

Planet Two was designed to inform, inspire, and engage. It carried on and refined the tradition of the Greenpeace website as news magazine, with a backend that was designed to widen the number of people who could publish content to our website — from HR Managers posting jobs to press officers posting press releases to publication managers publishing reports — we brought a wealth of content forward.

But when it came time design Planet Three, we were all about “Inspire, Engage, and Mobilize.” We wanted actions that our supporters could take big and proud. We wanted ways our supporters could replicate content through social media to be everywhere. We wanted the site to provide positive feedback for actions taken, donations made, letters sent, petitions signed. We wanted a sign-in system that would allow the site to recognise our supporters and personalize their experience. We wanted a site that featured our award-winning photography in big bold formats. We wanted a site that was less about us, and more about our amazing network of supporters and what they can do. And that’s what Andrew and his team delivered.

 

1 Comment

Filed under Greenpeace, Popular, Webdesign

Easter Bunny Vs Orangutan


Elaine Hill in our office put this one together, which I just find too cute for words. (Want to send it?  It’s an Ecard)

Mind you, I did favor a different treatment, which I call Easter Bunny Vs. Orangutan Death Match, but I guess we’ve already reached the slasher fan demographic with our original take.

Amid the ongoing advice that Nestle is getting from PR professionals about how they should have handled the onslaught of Social Media attention they got, it’s notable how few have gotten right the very first question Nestle should have asked themselves:

Are we doing something wrong, and what can we do to fix it?

That’s what listening to your customers is really about.  That’s what real corporate responsibility is about. The first question isn’t how do we leverage social media to blunt this attack, or put the best face on our company, or divert attention to questioning the motives of the attackers.  It’s what is the real issue that our customers care so deeply about, and how do we align our actions with their expectations?

So many blogs have trumpeted Nestle’s announcement that they were canceling direct contracts with Sinar Mas as a win that Greenpeace ignored – but they clearly didn’t read the fine print. Nestle acknowledges that by buying from palm oil conglomerate Cargill, they’re sill buying Sinar Mas.  So what kind of a concession is that, precisely?

A major plank of the Greenpeace demand set was to ask Nestle to pressure Cargill to clean up its supply chain, and to implement means of guaranteeing that they’re not buying palm oil from deforestation.

This is not an unprecedented tactic.  Cargill was previously at the center of a storm over the planting of Soy in the Amazon on deforested land.  Greenpeace’s target then was Cargill customer McDonald’s.  McDonalds did precisely what Nestle should have done: gathered a critical mass of purchasing power and sat Cargill down and read them the riot act. The result was a moratorium, still in place, on deforestation for soy plantations.  Cargill had no financial interest in stopping deforestation until their own customers made it their  interest. And those corporate customers only had a financial interest in stopping deforestation because their customers made it their interest.

Nestle and Unilever, between them, have sufficient economic clout to insist Cargill not fund deforestation — the money that flows from Kit Kat customer to Nestle to Cargill to Sinar Mas is what’s destroying Indonesia’s rainforest — Greenpeace catalyzed a revolution at the source.

And until Nestle actually rolls up its sleeves and works to solve the problem instead of making cosmetic changes, they’ve not conceded, and they’ve not done the right thing in the eyes of their customers.

Corporate responsibility isn’t just about ducking criticism, or doing enough to get out of the crosshairs, or managing your PR spin — it’s about doing the right thing, and using the power of your brand and your purchasing power constructively.

Easter is the biggest chocolate-buying time of the year, and Nestle is going to be missing out a lot of sales, not because they’ve mismanaged a social media attack, but because they’re contributing to the destruction of our planet and the acceleration of climate change. They’ve underestimated the willingness of their customer base to take action for our planet’s future, and failed to sense the expectation that Nestle should do the same.


1 Comment

Filed under Activism, Environmental Issues, Forests, Kit Kat, Webdesign

Non-profit ROI Poetry Slam

Live from the Nonprofit Poetry Slam #roi on TwitPic

Fantastic to watch, impossible to describe,
A poetry slam about non-profit ROI
The groups that take blogs and facebooks and twitters
And turn them to saving both people and critters
Spun iambics and rhymes around all their banter
In this panel assembled by (brilliant) Beth Kanter
They told of Twestivals, LoL Seals, and Apps
That raised money, awareness, and the eyebrows of chaps
In management who aren’t down with the groove
Of using these cool social marketing tools
They took tweets from the audience, how cool is that?
And one of them wore that cat hat cat’s hat!
I loved it, I learned stuff, I had a great time
And yeah, I was the guy who was tweeting in rhyme.

Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under Activism, sxsw, Webdesign

Off to SXSW

I’m in the airport lounge at Schipol hitting myself on the head.  I’ve been planning my schedule at SXSW in Austin (Woo hoo!!!!) for the last couple weeks, in those spare micro-slivers of time one finds if one looks hard enough, and trying to figure out how to share it here.  DOH. It’s an RSS feed dummy.  Render in Feed2Js and hey presto, here it is, after the More click.  

If you want to hear about any of these sessions in particular, leave a comment.  I’m planning on live blogging some, but not all.  

Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under sxsw, Webdesign

Innophoria

There are a thousand other things I should be doing at the moment, but this 4am I woke up to find this video on Facebook from my fellow madman Marcelo Inniara. How many people know what Innophoria is? The fake dictionary in the intro defines it as that feeling of sublime content that washes over one after coming up with a really good idea. I love this concept, and the game which Marcelo is designing:   he’s asking Online Social Networking campaigners to share what’s worked and what hasn’t in their innovation efforts, and create “Good cards” and “Bad cards” from their real life experience. Fantastic idea. The game goes live in March 2009. Site’s still a bit buggy, but there’s a negative card for the fictional Lucy and Joe: “I created a site that could have recruited a whole heap of people, but the signup form was broken during our peak traffic!” Ok, I know we’re talking a limited audience here, but you know who you are people — this isn’t a game, this is the story of your life.[swf movie=“http://www.youtube.com/v/V3xR4ylQciQ&hl=en&fs=1″ width=“425” height=“344” /]

Leave a Comment

Filed under Activism, Webdesign

Aggregating a global online action count

We strive at Greenpeace International to provide online activist tools that all of our offices can use worldwide. Our content management system is used by nearly all, and that has hard benefits, from being able to share webbies across offices with no additional training, to pooling development costs, content sharing and reduction of effort duplication.

But we’re a federation rather than a corporation. The uptake of tools is voluntary, and offices that want to do their own thing can. But it makes it harder to speak with one voice, act with one mind, and display aggregated results with one piece of software. Which is the subject of today’s entry: how I scraped the websites of Greenpeace offices around the world for a single data point, the number of people who had written to the Japanese government demanding release of our two whale activists, and summed them up into one global number that every office could display.

Starting backward, here’s the result:


a single cell from a Google Spreadsheet, which can be IFRAMED in to any web page using the code

<iframe width=‘150’ height=‘45’ frameborder=‘0’ src=‘http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=ppfKzvgYsAS9E5DwKZH-dMA&output=html&gid=0&single=true&range=E2’></iframe><br/>

To generate that number, I used two primary tools: the FETCHPAGE module in Yahoo Pipes to scrape values from our various websites and create an RSS feed of those values, and the ImportFeed function of Google Spreadsheets to read those values, update them once an hour, and aggregate them.

Continue reading

3 Comments

Filed under Creativity, Greenpeace, Webdesign

Empowering (Digital) Heroism

There are a few big forces having to do with online work moving around within the castle walls at Greenpeace at the moment. The Greenpeace Planet Content Management System, which I’ve been part of shaping through two iterations and now serves all but a few of our offices worldwide, is due for a replacement. We’re moving toward a globally agreed single fundraising database/CRM system. And we concluded last year a major assessment of our identity which gave us some lighthouses for our organisational communications and development strategies.

One of the strongest trends over the past few years that our identity work crystallised was the concept of Greenpeace as “Empowering hero” — being the hero that inspires others to act, rather than the hero everyone sits back passively and watches save the day on their own.  This has been a central development thread in our public engagement work on the web and one I’m convinced we can take farther.

Yesterday, in thinking about the process we’re about to embark on in choosing a content management system, ensuring it talks to our fundraiser database, re-imagining how our websites and blogs interact and behave and look and feel, and doing all the cat herding and shuttle diplomacy that these efforts entail in a global, distributed-decision-making institution like Greenpeace, I decided to think about first principles, and came up with the following rough cut of ten principles that I think need to guide our thinking.

Digital Direction and Empowering Heroism
Ten implications of Greenpeace’s Identity on our relationship to our supporters and the digital properties they interact with.

1. Our digital properties should be designed to inform, inspire, and activate – though not in that order. Greenpeace leads with action.

2. A supporter is anyone who supports Greenpeace: with money, time, words, or actions. The first measure of success of our digital properties is the degree to which they help us win campaigns. Without supporters, we win nothing. The primary ongoing mission of our digital properties is to recruit and activate supporters.

3. When an individual chooses to support a global organisation like Greenpeace, they support the entire organisation – not just a national sector or a single campaign. Our digital properties need to make clear they contribute to more than one sector, they can participate in more than one way. By supporting any part of the organisation’s work, they support the entire organisation.

4. A supporter is not an object – it is a relationship. The second measure of the success of our digital properties is the degree to which they provide supporters with easy ways to find the right relationship with the organisation: every transaction should offer the option of a national or local context, an option to receive information in the supporter’s own language, an option to receive precisely the right level and frequency of information. Every transaction should provide options to move to a higher level of involvement — from casual reader to information subscriber, from information subscriber to online activist, from online activist to monetary donor, from monetary donor to time donor, from time donor to evangelist – or any of a dozen other paths to more involvement that we might provide.

5. The relationship to our supporters is not owned by Greenpeace, or any part of Greenpeace. The supporter owns it. Our digital properties should allow the supporter to easily determine
· the information they want Greenpeace to give them
· the information they want Greenpeace to have
· the information they want other supporters to see.

6. Every supporter should be recognised as a supporter in any exchange with the organisation – via web, phone, email to supporter services – no matter what office they are signed up with. All our digital properties need to be able to exchange information with a single universal supporter identification system.

7. If our supporters choose to offer up information about their identity, our digital properties should welcome them by name, know what they like and dislike, remember what they have done, and always provide them with options to do more.

8. Everything we publish should be created in a way that maximizes its chances of being republished. If a supporter has a blog, our digital properties should know that, and offer immediate opportunities to replicate content. If a supporter passes information along to friends or shares information from their address book, our digital properties should offer the option to store that list of contact information for the supporter to use again.

9. Our digital properties should encourage community and supporter network interactions – not simple us-to-them or them-to-us pathed interactions. Our digital properties should encourage user-generated content alongside our institutionally-generated content.

10. We encourage action to save the planet – not only the actions that we design and endorse, but in a wider sense of encouraging people to take actions in their daily lives, to take personal responsibility for protecting our planet for future generations. Our digital properties should not simply be about inspiring people to take action with Greenpeace – they should provide paths and tools and stories which inspire action, full stop.

Selah. Work in progress. Comments welcome.

7 Comments

Filed under Activism, Webdesign

Sustainable choices at Digital Eskimo

Digital Eskimo is a web design firm out of Oz which did some work for us a few years back. Here’s a solid little tour of some of the ecological choices they made in kitting out their office, and a positive story to tell the world. 

We’re looking at some changes to our office here in Amsterdam to reduce our ecological footprint. I’m loving the idea of an office wormfarm.

Thanks to Trina for posting this on her outstanding Greenfoot blog.

technorati tags:,

Blogged with Flock

3 Comments

Filed under Green Design, Webdesign

Wikis in Plain English

Brave New Web: The How-To Site for Bloggers, Podcasters and the Social Media: Baffled by wikis? A new online video from CommonCraft can help.

I went looking for something that explains Wikis to the uninformed last week, then saw this, from Rusty Cawley, pop up in the RSS feed on my Google Homepage. Magic!

We’re using Wikis quite a bit now in the web team at Greenpeace International for sharing internal information, support tips on our content management system, and lessons learned on the e-campaigning front, but they suffer from that old 1% rule: One percent of the people who visit the wiki contribute content. Others (some of them webbies) will actually E-mail suggested content or critique rather than roll up their sleeves and get in there and, Wiki-Tiki-Tavi-like, bare their mongoose teeth and wrestle the snake themselves. If they’re missing the basic concept, this video, which *features no computers* is a great way to break down that old “it’s geek, I’m not” response.

Now where oh where is the instructional video that takes folks the next step: to quickly and painlessly demonstrate the finer points of link creation, image insert, page creation, and the basics that anyone needs to just get started? I’ve looked at everything listed at the Wikipedia entry on Wiki Instructional Videos, and I found them universally awful. Those of us who aren’t afraid to poke around and figure this stuff out need to remember that we need to bring along the digitally shy as well if we ever want this stuff to be truly useful. And like “Wikis in Plain English” we need to make it FUN.

technorati tags:, ,

Blogged with Flock

1 Comment

Filed under Creativity, Webdesign

My Google homepage GONE?

Jakob Nielsen used to say that the best test of whether you’d created a useful website was this: take it down. See how many people scream.

Google, if you’re listening, I AM SCREAMING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Continue reading

6 Comments

Filed under Webdesign

A few Greenpeace campaign tools described

I used a couple-three internal buzz words the other day in an email exchange, and was asked to define a “Pre-order Petition,” a “Buzz Visualizer” and “Brand Judo.” These are examples of a few tools that Greenpeace has used successfully in the past, and I thought I’d share:
Pre-order petitions

A pre-order petition is a way of demonstrating a market for a product that may not exist yet. It’s a convenient way to counter industry flacks who say “we don’t produce environmentally sound products, because there is no market for them.” Or “nobody will pay more a green product.”

Greenpeace Germany did this with GreenFreeze by asking supporters if they would commit to being the first purchasers of a new refrigeration technology that didn’t use climate-killing chemicals.

In the spring of 1992 Greenpeace brought together scientists who had extensively researched the use of propane and butane as refrigerants, with an East German company DKK Scharfenstein. The company had been producing refrigerators for 50 years and was the leading household appliance manufacturer in the former East Germany. After reunification, however, it faced severe economic problems and was due to be closed down.

When DKK Scharfenstein announced their intention to mass produce “GreenFreeze”, Greenpeace Germany successfully campaigned to gather tens of thousands of pre-orders for the yet-to-be-produced new refrigerator from environmentally conscious consumers. This overwhelming support from the public secured the capital investment needed for the new ‘GreenFreeze’ product, and at the same time, salvaged the company and saved the jobs of its workers.

Buzz visualizers

A “buzz visualizer” is a means to reflect back to your audience that others are already taking the action you are asking them to take. It can be a page or widget which simply demonstrates that others are talking about and taking action around a particular issue: a feedback loop. Good canvassers know that you never, ever, present a blank petition to anyone. People who think they are the only ones or first one taking action resist. People who see their neighbors’ names on a petition or get a sense of lots of people acting together are more likely to join in.

A buzz visualizer can be as simple as a technorati graph like this one, which charts mentions of “Light Bulbs” and “Global Warming” occurring together in blogs for the last 180 days:

Or it could look like the Green my Apple iBuzz page, which shows latest Flickr photo submissions, latest blog mentions, and latest socially bookmarked mentions of the campaign:

http://www.greenmyapple.org/buzz

It can also be as simple as a “donation thermometer” which charts how close to a financial goal a fundraising drive has gotten.

Brand Strength Judo

When trying to wrestle with a strong brand, “Brand Strength Judo” is a means of channeling a brand’s own strength against it, so that all the advertising money that they have put into creating a consumer identity or a brand icon gets subverted BY the campaign, making that identity or icon work for us and our objectives.

An example would be using Apple users’ love of their Apple products (something that Apple has cultivated and made powerful) as the force demanding environmental change at Apple. We don’t attack the brand, we use its own strength by saying “We love our Macs, we just wish they came in Green.”

Another example would be using Iceland’s reputation as a Nature destination for tourists (an identity they put big advertising into) against it by reaching out to precisely those tourists with the message that Iceland is killing whales.

Or subverting Coke’s Polar Bears from brand symbols to climate change victims in our spoof messaging.

technorati tags:, , ,

Blogged with Flock

Leave a Comment

Filed under Greenpeace, Popular, Webdesign

ARGs: the attack of the Alternate Reality Games

OcularEffect.jpgMy notes from this panel have vaporized now, but this was the discussion that most made me want to jump out of my seat and create something. And a few others, it would appear.

One, what is an ARG? It’s a TLA for Alternate Reality Game, and, as Joystiq.com notes

one of the problems was that the panel promised to help define the term “alternate reality game,” but that never happened. Wikipedia calls it “an interactive narrative that uses the real world as aplatform, often involving multiple media and game elements, to tell astory that may be affected by participants’ ideas or actions.”

Some examples mentioned by the panel included
Perplex City

I love bees
The LOST Experience

the Beast

Continue reading

5 Comments

Filed under Creativity, sxsw, Webdesign

Dogster. Catster. Wowster.

Dogster and Catster. Heard of them? Well it seems just about everybody at SXSW has by now. I wasn’t at the session, but I struck up a conversation with Michael and Laura Moncur of Starling Studios and they broke it down for me in the way that a Hollywood Blockbuster can be pitched:

It’s basically Am I Hot or Not for pets.”

Killer “why didn’t I think of that so I can be wealthy and still work for Greenpeace” concept. You upload your pet’s photos. They make friends like on MySpace. Like a dog? Give it a bone. And of course the more bones you have, the cooler you are.

You can search on pets by breed, location, favorite activities, an insane amount of information.
According to Mike and Laura, site-creator Ted Rhinegold is pulling a million bucks a year off of ads, merch and the seemingly endless means of monetizing this site he has figured out. Well deserved. He’s obviously making a lot of people crazy happy. These sites are just pure unadulterated silly joy.
Laura comes up with a Greenpeace fundraising concept: What if you could make a pet a Greenpeace member? There are gifts on the site now that you can actually buy for Dogs you REALLY like: ribbons and such. What if you could make your pet part of the solution to climate change by becoming a card-carrying member? What if your cat could help stomp out environmental pollutants? Quirky, crazy, nutty, cool.
Or maybe it’s time for… WHALESTER!
Gotta go. More insane creativity fields to run through to see what sticks!

technorati tags:, , , , ,

Blogged with Flock

2 Comments

Filed under Greenpeace, sxsw, Webdesign

Kathy Sierra SXSW Keynote

WONK WARNING: Raw, fast typing ahead. Won´t be 100% accurate, and definitely ain’t spell checked! Read no further if you want Dickens. He´s at some other conference. But if you wade on, you’re in for a brain treat.
Kathy Sierra kicks off the SXSW keynote by asking is anyone Live blogging this event? (Well, maybe not *quite* live, but I stick up my hand). She says OK, lots of people are recording this, people are vlogging it, webcasting it, putting it on twitter. So nobody else needs to be here. We could just strap those people into chairs and everybody else could go enjoy it at the bar, or later. So Why Are You Here?????

You guys make the products and use the technologies that mean that you don´t need to be here. But you´re here. There´s only one reason why you´re here. Scientists want to know why people like to be with real people. Some think it might be just smell. But if we want lovable applications, we need some form of HUMANNESS. Not a humane interface. Something that´s actually human.
Continue reading

12 Comments

Filed under sxsw, Webdesign

SXSW: Emerging Technology and Social Trends

Here’s just a few of the wisdom snags and snicker captures from the SXSW. WONK WARNING: these are raw unprocessed notes of a highly selective and sometimes unattributed nature. Just stuff that got past my crap filter.

Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under sxsw, Webdesign