Monthly Archives: August 2007

Pre Web History: World Park Antarctica

A colleague notices that the Wikipedia entry on Antarctica and the Antarctic Treaty makes no mention of Greenpeace’s successful five year campaign, back in the late 80s, to stop oil and mineral exploitation on the frozen continent.

This was such a formative experience in the organization’s history and such a massive, surprise victory that I was doubly shocked to realize that when I went to look for source material, our own mothership website at www.greenpeace.org/international also contained no mention.

But this is the way of history which predates the web: it needs

to be digitized by hand; it wasn’t captured as it happened.

I pulled together some existing materials into a quick canned history of World Park Antarctica, but it hardly reflects the immensity of this project, and the richness of stories and personalities and triumphs and failures.

When we stuck a base camp in the snow and ice near McMurdo Station, former Greenpeace honcho David McTaggart described it as Greenpeace “pissing in the same snow the Americans are pissing in.“

Technically, having a base was all that was required of a nation to be a party to the treaty negotiations, but of course, Greenpeace wasn’t a nation. And that, really, was one of the major points. Why should the countries that claimed slices of Antarctica by putting a presence down there have any more right to this global resource than a little slingshot-wielding environmental group that claimed to represent the people of planet earth?

Nobody played along with our claimant game, but we worked our way into those negotiations by hook and by crook anyway. The confrontation that McTaggart really longed for never came about. He had hoped that our base would become such a thorn in the side of the treaty parties, that one or more of them would try to evict us. He though of that as the ultimate exposure of the fiction of the treaty claims — the informally determined pie shaped territories which each nation declared its area by right of their presence without actually calling them their own, and which no law recognized as belonging to them in any legal sense.

Instead, we became a respected presence, visiting the other bases on environmental inspections that kept everyone on their toes, doing some real science, and contributing to the literature and community of the highly exclusive club of Antarctic overwinterers.

And elsewhere on the planet, Kelly Rigg was running a global political campaign the likes of which Greenpeace has seldom emulated since. She fielded lobbyists into the treaty negotiations and hired campaigners in a half dozen swing countries directly from headquarters, a more centralized model than we use today. She could tap into some extremely influential political networks that McTaggart and a few others had built, which could deliver approaches to the Secretary General of the United Nations, op eds from Prince Sadruddin Aga Khan, appeals from Jacques Cousteau, and even logistical aid from Ted Turner.

I was working to set up our Italian office in those days, and conventional wisdom was that we needed to stick to local issues like the pollution of the Po river in order to build support, and the Antarctic work was simply too distant to be of interest. That is, until the receptionist, in an inspired bit of unauthorized chutzpah, wrote up an Antarctic fundraising appeal, mailed it out, and landed more donations than anything we’d tried previous. She was shortly promoted to fundraising director.

She’d seen what we’d underestimated, and what many others who dismissed the campaign as a folly failed to appreciate: the power of the Antarctic as an iconic wilderness, one of the last great unspoiled places in the world, and the expectation that Greenpeace, as a supra-national player and defender of the global commons, was the champion of choice to defend it.

Against all odds, we won. Antarctica today remains under the protection of a fifty year moratorium on oil and mineral exploitation.

20 years later at the opposite end of the world, a similar fight is brewing over the arctic. Rumors of vast oil riches, territorial positioning as the Russians plant a flag on the seabed, Canada rattling sabers, everyone trying to make a case for owning what nobody owns, and which they only want to own in order to plunder rather than protect.

It’s time to put a stop to this nonsense. The Arctic is the common property of every one of us. We should own it jointly as world citizens, protect it from the ravages of oil exploitation and global warming, isolate it from the din of nationalist squabbling, and keep it safe for future generations.

That would be a worthy struggle.


Blogged with Flock

5 Comments

Filed under Environmental Issues

Woo hoo! Iceland ends commercial whale hunt

Fin whaleGee, did I not write just three days ago:

with continued slow, steady pressure, I’m confident Iceland will come around to realizing stopping whaling isn’t simply a rainbow-colored item on some foreign hippy agenda, it’s a sound economic move.

Well begosh and begorin’ if news doesn’t come hurtling down the stormpipe today that Iceland’s fisheries minister has finally put the kebosh on the silly fiction that Iceland’s whaling industry is going to make a comeback by killing whales that nobody wants to eat:

The whaling industry, like any other industry, has to obey the market. If there is no profitability there is no foundation for resuming with the killing of whales,” he said.

He declared there would be no more commercial quotas in the absence of evidence the meat could actually be sold.

Well now there’s a refreshing bit of homespun wisdom that the heavily subsidized Japanese whalers, sitting on several thousand tonnes of surplus whale meat they can’t even give away, ought to listen to.

Iceland stands to gain so much by abandoning whaling. 112,000 of us have pledged to visit if the government just hangs up those harpoons forever — collectively, we’d spend approximately 116 million US dollars.

The government didn’t quite definitively announce an end to whaling.

There’s an outstanding scientific quota of 6 minke whales that Icelandic whalers still may catch in the one month remaining of the Icelandic whaling season.

But at 20 million dollars apiece in foregone tourist income, that seems a lot of money to blow on whale steaks that are going to sit unsold in a freezer.

It’s time to go have a glass of champagne, and raise a toast to Remi, who sailed on the first Greenpeace mission to stop Icelandic whaling, and woke up from a siesta today to the news that he’d finally won. Then it’s time to toast Frode, and Arni, and Frizell, and McTaggart, and Thornton, and Gerd, and Adele, and Andrew, and Lisa, and Marnee and Tomakint, and all 112,000 Icelandic pledgers.

I am going to have one whale of a hangover tomorrow.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Environmental Issues, Greenpeace

Teutonic kilted tango-crazy yankee wiener pasta team


Today we were comparing meeting routines for the Communications departments Martina and Oscar had run in other Greenpeace offices. Martina, from Germany, set up a two hour weekly meeting. Punctuality was mandatory, or you couldn’t attend. The agenda was carefully developed on a rotating basis by members of the staff, circulated beforehand, and time –policied to ensure a precise division of the meeting between one hour of update and evaluation and one hour of philosophical or positioning debate or brainstorming.

Oscar, from Buenos Aires, held his weekly meetings in a bar after work for a half hour sometimes, sometimes more, and sometimes followed by Tango dancing. Their creative process cooked with beer.

Both these offices have produced outstanding work.

So what are we to learn about best practice, and what are we, this global team, to take away as learnings from these experiences? We started with the single element common to both.

We shall meet weekly.




Blogged with Flock

2 Comments

Filed under Offtopic

Whales winning, whalers glum

We’re coming up to the last weeks of the Icelandic commercial whale hunt, and I couldn’t be more pleased at what a disaster it has been. Of the 29 minke and 2 fin whales in the 2007 hunting quota, they haven’t even caught 10 minkes.

Iceland’s decision last year to resume commercial whaling caused an international ruckus. But more importantly, it hasn’t enjoyed the unified flag-waving patriotic support that it used to. Witness this bit of commentary from DavidMixner.com:

Icelanders too, are not universally happy about the resumption of whaling. Most are acutely aware that the $1 billion earned from fishery exports account for 50% of their foreign currency earnings, and that there is a real need to diversify their economy. Of all the other economic sectors, tourism is the fastest growing (7% per year), earning over $300 million in export revenues. A Gallup poll suggested that 48 per cent of Icelanders believed that resuming whaling would have ‘a rather negative or very negative impact on Iceland’s tourism industry’. Greenpeace can also attest to this as they have a list of over 110,000 people who pledged that they would visit Iceland only if the country stopped commercial whaling. This represents $115 million in potential income that quite heavily outweighs the potential $3–4 million in value generated by whaling. At the end of the day, it is Iceland’s world-class whale-watching tourism ventures that take the financial hit.

The Iceland Whales Pledge was a campaign that was cooked up in two very fast weeks some years ago when Iceland announced it was going to expand it’s whaling program from dozens of whales to hundreds.
The Rainbow Warrior was on its way to take action in the Mediterranean, but our Executive Director, in one of those moves only an Executive Director can make, ordered the boat to Iceland and gave us the transit time to come up with a plan.

Andrew Davies was the guy who sparked this idea, a “reverse boycott” as he called it, and it fit perfectly into our lead campaigner’s concept: don’t confront the whalers head on — that just made domestic dissenters look like traitors. But woo and win the forces within Iceland, be they principled, economic, or political, to challenge it domestically.

It worked then — Iceland abandoned the expansion plan — and with continued slow, steady pressure, I’m confident Iceland will come around to realizing stopping whaling isn’t simply a rainbow-colored item on some foreign hippy agenda, it’s a sound economic move.

In other news, word on the grapevine has it that Norway’s whalers are a pretty glum lot at the moment as well — they’ve also failed to catch their annual quota.

Blogged with Flock

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Good on Gore: going all Gandhi

Jamie beat me to this post: Go, Gore, go.

I’d just add that when Al Gore was quoted in the NY Times as saying ” “I can’t understand why there aren’t rings of young people blocking bulldozers, and preventing them from constructing coal-fired power plants,“

I considered that the single bravest, most inspiring, ass-slappingly awesome sentence to come out of a US politician’s mouth since T.H. White was writing JFK’s speechs.

In a time in which the US Administration has tried to label non-violent direct action as terrorism, Gore put it where it should be: a civic responsibility in the face of inaction.

Of course, there HAVE been rings of young people surrounding coal powered plants, many of them in action with Greenpeace, around the world for some time — and it’s about time it happened in the US as well.

Gore gets it: the US political process isn’t enough. We all need to take the battle against Global Warming to the streets. Time for an Energy [r]evolution.

Blogged with Flock

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Bodily experiencing the Dutch countryside

Photo: De Telegraaf

I blow my nose this morning, and out comes muck. This is after two showers, a hosing off by the fire department, and a swim in (relatively) clean water. My legs feel like iron. My knees are rusted. The smell of my clothes as I put them in the washing machine this morning nearly made me barf.

Yesterday, I ran the Land over Zand competition in Broek in Waterland.

When colleague Tom asked if some of us wanted to compete in a half-hour fun run that involved getting muddy, a local tradition in farmer entertainment, I thought it would be easy. Tom, Eoin, Andrew and Tom’s friend Nico and I signed up in an impromptu Team Greenpeace, with Zeina on documentation duty. (See her great photos below and as a slideshow here.)

Team Greenpeace+

Andrew, Nico, Tom, Eoin, and myself after the race: Creative Commons Photo by Zeina

I no longer run daily, but I’ll still take an occasional slow jog. The last time I took a turn around the park was a few weeks back, and a half hour wasn’t taxing. The part of me that stills see myself as a runner and refuses to believe I’ve aged wanted to thumb my nose at my 49th birthday in some way. This seemed easy.

Easy it was not. And my body’s 49 years thumbed their noses right back at me. This was a run in which you had to swim, lunge, wade, climb, and scramble a 4 km circle around the town of Broek in Waterland, carrying a significant extra weight of Dutch farmland around plastered to your skin, hair and clothing.

Continue reading

6 Comments

Filed under Personal

Major Flickr meltdown

Flickr hacked?Now what strangeness is this? I noticed a friend’s flickr photos have been replaced by tinypic’s “This image has been moved or deleted,” then I look at mine. Same thing. Click on Everyone’s Phots, same thing. Clever hack by someone disgruntled with Flickr’s censorship decision? Ad ploy by Tinypic to poach users?

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

User Generated Discontent

Inspired by Anil

Podnosh spotted this: from twitter comment to T-Shirt to Flickr photo. Virtual to physical and back to virtual. What Bruce Sterling called a part of the “internet of things” at SXSW two years ago.

I sooooooo want to use this as a Greenpeace.org strap line.

–b

technorati tags:, ,

Blogged with Flock

1 Comment

Filed under Net Culture, sxsw

Hockey Helmets and Climate Change

AttributionNoncommercialNo Derivative Works

Photo by Kenneth Malcolm

Tucked among the pile of New Yorkers that were sprawled out at my doorstep when I got back from vacation was this tiny parable from David Surowiecki, who writes a fascinating weekly article on economics (he’s also the author of the Wisdom of Crowds):

Back in the nineteen-seventies, an economist named Thomas Schelling,who later won the Nobel Prize, noticed something peculiar about the N.H.L. [National Hockey League] At the time, players were allowed, but not required, to wear helmets, and most players chose to go helmet-less, despite the risk of severe head trauma. But when they were asked in secret ballots most players also said that the league should require them to wear helmets.The reason for this conflict, Schelling explained, was that not wearing a helmet conferred a slight advantage on the ice; crucially, it gave the player better peripheral vision, and it also made him look fearless. The players wanted to have their heads protected, but as individuals they couldn’t afford to jeopardize their effectiveness on the ice. Making helmets compulsory eliminated the dilemma: the players could protect their heads without suffering a competitive disadvantage.

The article draws a parallel with fuel efficiency and SUVs — individually, people choose large, inefficient cars, but when surveyed a large majority want fuel efficiency standards to be made mandatory.
This to me is a defining point about what any government’s role should be in safeguarding the environment. Individual choices don’t always represent our collective wisdom.
Collectively, we’ll say concern about the future of our planet and our children’s future well-being should outweigh short term individual benefits. But there are always a thousand reasons to still make those destructive choices individually, especially if we see them as conferring benefits greater than their marginal harm.
And when in a capitalist system the two major drivers are individual choice and corporate profit, collective wisdom, the global commons, and our collective future are left without a champion unless another force steps in.

Ken Livingston’s congestion tax on cars in central London is a perfect example of Hockey Helmet government at its best. In 2003 when Livingston introduced the tax, he was slammed by the tabloids and met fierce resistance from drivers who simply didn’t want their individual right to drive in central London curtailed. Many said the move would doom him as Mayor.
But the collective benefits have been significant. Car speeds in the city centre are up thirty-seven percent and carbon-dioxide emissions have dropped by fifteen per cent. The plan has been expanded. According to Elizabeth Kolbert, two thirds of Londoners now support it. And New York City is about to follow London’s lead.

The Hockey-Helmet approach to government is anathema to conservatives. But when the cost of damage to our environment and the worlds’ future aren’t factored into the costs of production, free market forces are never going to make us put those helmets on.

Blogged with Flock

2 Comments

Filed under Environmental Issues, Human Nature